GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/326886/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 326886,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/326886/?format=api",
"text_counter": 624,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Abdikadir",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 1,
"legal_name": "Abdikadir Hussein Mohamed",
"slug": "abdikadir-mohammed"
},
"content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, Article 206 of the Constitution states: “There is established the Consolidated Fund into which shall be paid all money raised or received by or on behalf of the national Government except money (a) that is reasonably excluded from the Fund by an Act of Parliament and payable into another public fund established for a specific purpose, or (b) that may under an Act of Parliament be retained by the State organ that received it for the purpose of defraying the expense of the State organ.” Those are the only two cases when the KRA is neither---. It is, therefore, not possible to move on that matter. Secondly, I also do not even think that there is any merit to state to the tax collector that he should go on and pick whatever he wants from the tax collected. Let them send money to the Consolidated Fund and then the National Assembly will decide how it will be voted on. If they have problems, it is the National Assembly that will be correcting issues. It is up to the National Assembly to vote funds into specified votes. I do not think it is a good idea for the KRA to be scheming."
}