Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 326890,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/326890/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 628,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Ethuro",
    "speaker_title": "The Temporary Deputy Chairman",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 158,
        "legal_name": "Ekwee David Ethuro",
        "slug": "ekwee-ethuro"
    },
    "content": " Order, Minister! You have read the letter and since you are relying on the advice of the Attorney-General, there is no point adding more. It is very clear. If you look at Article 206 of the Constitution and the concluding paragraph of the letter from the Attorney-General, there are two things you can do. You can reasonably exclude money from the Fund, which the law is attempting to do, but it can only qualify if it is payable to another public Fund. The KRA does not qualify to be a public Fund. The second one is (b). You can do so, but through an Act of Parliament to a State organ. He explained that. My job, therefore, is extremely simple. I had talked about the Standing Order No.43, but I got it wrong. It is the Standing Order No.47(3), which states that:- “If the Speaker is of the opinion that any proposed Motion- (b) is contrary to the Constitution, without expressly proposing appropriate amendment of the Constitution; the Speaker may direct either that, the Motion is inadmissible or that notice of it cannot be given without such alteration as the Speaker may approve”. I direct that the both amendments are inadmissible. It means that the proposed amendment to Clause 23 is inadmissible. So, there is no amendment to that particular clause. Hon. Ogindo and hon. Midiwo, this matter is very clear to the Chair. I will only entertain if I was anticipating that there is something more useful that you could add."
}