GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/346414/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 346414,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/346414/?format=api",
"text_counter": 371,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Speaker",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "Order, Member for Rarieda! I will not at this point rule you out of order. Just as I cautioned you, it is treacherous when a matter has already received directions for you to revisit it. The issues that you are broaching now are obviously tending towards breach of Standing Order No.79. You are imputing improper motive on a colleague. You cannot do so unless you bring a substantive Motion, even if you are privy to some conversation which, I believe, is otherwise supposed to be confidential. But if you want to make it public then bring a substantive Motion. Otherwise, wait for the next 24 hours and you can speak to those matters after this matter comes on the Order Paper. It is not too far off, Member for Rarieda; I know you are a seasoned professional who is awake to some of these realities. Speak to it tommorow morning. It is so directed. Before we take the next Order, I think the times we are dealing with are a bit difficult or challenging. The Member for Mosop, in his capacity as the chairman of the Committee on Education, Research and Technology worked very hard against time to prepare a report which he was not able to get to the House as we transacted business at Order No.4. So, we will interrupt business on the Order Paper at this point to deal with a matter which would normally come under Order No.4."
}