Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 356673,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/356673/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 95,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Ms.) Kajuju",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 840,
        "legal_name": "Florence Kajuju",
        "slug": "florence-kajuju"
    },
    "content": "I rise to oppose the deletion of Clause 6 in the sense that maybe they do not understand what alternative dispute resolution provides. Alternative dispute resolution is all about negation and arbitration. When there is a relationship, as it is going to be between the National Government and the county government there is bound to be conflict. When conflict arises, what is required is that parties explore all alternative means of dispute resolution before they move to a court of law. This clause does not follow that if you go to court to file a frivolous claim, then it means that you are being criminalized. What it provides is that if you file a frivolous claim, then you will take personal liability for the process and cost that you have made the government either at the county level or at the national level to incur. I state that it is not right to dilute that clause. It is properly placed in this law. The Constitution allows for alternative dispute"
}