Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 376572,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/376572/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 412,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "July 25, 2013 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 33 Hon. (Ms.) Muhia",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Hon. Deputy Speaker, the public would have assessed our capability, accountability and transparency. The first clarification I seek is this: Does the structure on the basis of 50 to 50 not attract conflict between my constituency MP and I? This is because who will bring the chairperson on board if I elect three members at the ward level? The second clarification is this: In case of default, who owns those projects? Is it the women representatives or the Member of Parliament at the constituency level? The third one is this: What is the role of the women representatives as a patron? Is she not just a figure because at the constituency level the funds are given from ward level? Should we not try to avoid the conflict? Is this structure permanent or can it be changed?"
}