Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 376573,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/376573/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 413,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kajwang",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2712,
        "legal_name": "Tom Joseph Kajwang'",
        "slug": "kajwang-tom-joseph-francis"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Deputy Speaker, part of the problem we have run into as a House and that is the reason I suspect there are many people who want to ventilate on this matter is because the fund has been structured by way of a manual or a circular. A lot of things have been said. However, looking at Article 206(2), it states that money may be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund only (a) in accordance with an appropriation by an Act of Parliament; or (b) in accordance with Article 222 which is Vote on Account or 223 which is Supplementary; and (c) as a charge against the Fund as authorized by this Constitution or an Act of Parliament. I am begging for clarification. How else is the Cabinet Secretary able to withdraw money from the Consolidated Fund even for the use on Uwezo without following Article 206? I suspect that if the proposals by the Cabinet Secretary---"
}