Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 378167,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/378167/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 260,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Obviously as relates to the rights of parties in contracts, that is a function of the Judiciary, when there is breach to interpret and declare. As you say, if, indeed, the matter is before court, and the issues before court are the same, or substantially similar to the ones you may wish to raise here, then further debate on this could easily infringe on the sub judice rule. It will not be fair for the House to appear to have made the law and then decide that it is the one to interpret the same law and declare certain positions. You may be better seized of the matter than the Chair. However, to the extent that some of the matters you are raising could be up for determination by the court then debate on the matter would be inappropriate."
}