GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/378168/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 378168,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/378168/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 261,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kajwang",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2712,
        "legal_name": "Tom Joseph Kajwang'",
        "slug": "kajwang-tom-joseph-francis"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Speaker, I thank you for your remarks and observations on that issue. You are definitely right on the law. However, I do not know if it is possible that you allow us to make one or two comments on the same. I was just reflecting on Standing Order No.89 that the Leader of Majority Party brought up. It would seem that under Standing No.89 sub judice applies only where the civil proceedings have been set down for trial. Even then the hon. Member claiming that the issue is sub judice has shown the House that the matter has progressed in hearing--- This will allow Members to ventilate on issues, but not necessarily to decide the rights of others. Members will be in a position to investigate issues even though somebody claims that he has filed an issue before a court of law. Hon. Speaker, without going against your comments and observations, probably you could allow us to ventilate on the issues unless, of course, a Member is able to show that an issue is advanced and has been listed for hearing. I wanted to seek clarification from the Leader of Majority Party, if you allow me, at the right point in time."
}