Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 388987,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/388987/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 351,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "the highest powers in the land? Is it really practical to expect them to get justice when the highest powers in the land are the ones who are going to execute things in this country? Let us be fair and get a neutral ground where both can be heard fairly and where justice can be done. But if we insist on speaking only on the one side of the case, we are being very partisan; we are not looking at all the Kenyans. In any case, some of the issues which are being brought here are constitutional issues. If we are going to change them, we have to refer back to the people of Kenya because they are fundamental issues affecting human rights in this country. That is why this Constitution was passed, so that the ordinary Kenyan can be protected and defended. But here we are, only thinking of three people and not the victims. In any case, we cannot fault the ICC because it has even acquitted three people out of six. That is a very good record. Why do you fear that they are not going to acquit the others? If out of six, three have been acquitted, give the others a chance before the same court so that fairness can be done. Mr. Speaker, Sir, the process started a long time ago and now we are trying to intervene in the middle. Is this really fair to those who have already been tried? Let those who were there with them also face the same justice so that justice can be seen to be done to all. In any case, when you look at the Motion - I was going to raise some very fundamental issues – it is not even grammatical in the way it is written. It should read: - “Address, among others, the following: Continued co-operation” and not “continue to co- operate.” That is not very good!"
}