Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 397426,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/397426/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 379,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kajwang",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2712,
        "legal_name": "Tom Joseph Kajwang'",
        "slug": "kajwang-tom-joseph-francis"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Chairlady, it should be left the way it was proposed originally by the Committee; theirs did not have the 90 days. When you put the 90 days, you make assumptions that the dispute settlement can work within those 90 days. You will notice that in the Act that we passed, the dispute is settled in the High Court and this court may not run the race of 90 days because of several other things that happen and affect legislation. So, to put the 90 days is really to say that there will be no determination of dispute, particularly in favour of the person who is disputing the tax. I would like the amendment by the Member to be accepted but the “b” part of it, which talks about 90 days is unreasonable."
}