GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/398016/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 398016,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/398016/?format=api",
"text_counter": 151,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Hon. Kaluma",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 1565,
"legal_name": "George Peter Opondo Kaluma",
"slug": "george-peter-opondo-kaluma"
},
"content": "National Defence Council, the Armed Forces system and the police service system to secure the nation. The misnomer that we are debating – we are even seeking to give people money and facilities, so that they can guard us – is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution or in any other laws dealing with the security of the nation. I am seeking firm directions on this matter. Are we seeking to legitimise an unconstitutional outfit because of failures within our internal security apparatus? Why are we not talking about how to facilitate the National Police Service and other legitimate security forces in the country to do their work more effectively? I am concerned that this Motion is outright unconstitutional. We are thinking of arming and giving money to people who are not recognised within our legal systems. Looking at Chapter 14 through-- -"
}