Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 399142,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/399142/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 256,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "life of the Transition Authority. The Transition Authority is provided for in a different legislation and they had three years to run. So whether or not this amendment Bill is passed, the Transition Authority will continue in office. I find the Senator out of order with regard to Article 5 of the Act he is referring to. The essence of this Act is transition. All these people are transitional and the Act is clear. It is up to the point when they get their people on board. Immediately you get an officer on board, the transitional person is either appointed and confirmed by his board and becomes a member of your staff or he goes back to the Transition Authority. That is what has happened in all the counties. I think Section 6 (2) is very clear on this. It states:- “Upon establishment of a county government, the officers deployed in that Section 5 shall be deemed to be seconded to the County Government”. However, as soon as the county government appoints his team – this is provided for in Section 18 – then these other people cease to have any role. Lastly, Section 30 says that the provisions of the PFMA Act also apply concurrently with this one. It reads:-"
}