Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 408364,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/408364/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 252,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Sakaja",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13131,
        "legal_name": "Johnson Arthur Sakaja",
        "slug": "johnson-arthur-sakaja"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I want to agree with and support the amendment by hon. Eng. Gumbo. Based on experience, at least from the perspective of a political party, a lot of times when dealing with the IEBC, or other similar institutions, you might find cases where there is mischief in respect to what they want to get as a political party. I am happy that we passed the earlier one because a person who is not authorized might give information that is not necessary. On this one, we need to be very clear that if it is a matter to do with this law and they want to get information or correspondence from a political party, it will be good for them to quote under which provision they will be seeking the information, just to make things neat, and so that the response is given in the right manner. For that reason, I support. I disagree a bit with hon. Makali. This is because all other laws under which other institutions work--- Already, they should be empowered to do that. If they want to come and get information pursuant to Chapter 6 or any other law on integrity or financial propriety then that law should empower them. If those laws do not empower them to take such action, then there must be good reason why those other laws do not give them the mandate or authority to take action. For that particular reason, I would like to support the further amendment by hon. Eng. Gumbo."
}