GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/409642/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 409642,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/409642/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 392,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. Clause 42, we want to renumber the existing provision as subclause (2) and then introduce subclause (1), which states “(1) A person aggrieved by a decision of the Council may appeal to the Commission against that decision in such manner as may be prescribed”. What this means is that if the Council makes a decision of whatever nature and somebody is not happy about it, that person may actually go to the Complaints Commission for review of that decision. If you look at Clause 42 which we want to renumber as subclause (2), it states “a party aggrieved by the decision of the Commission may---”. The first one is the decision of the Council which can be appealed at the Commission, then the decision of the Commission which can be appealed at the High Court. That is the way we put it."
}