GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/415556/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 415556,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/415556/?format=api",
"text_counter": 411,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Hon. Ethuro",
"speaker_title": "February 14, 2013 SENATE DEBATES 65 The Speaker",
"speaker": {
"id": 158,
"legal_name": "Ekwee David Ethuro",
"slug": "ekwee-ethuro"
},
"content": " Order! Order, Senators! I think the issue raised by Sen. Wako is a valid one in terms of the procedure, because earlier I had ruled that we will be voting on each charge. And then the issue that Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale was trying to offer unsolicited advice, which might be useful, is; do you impeach a Governor on account of one, two or three? So, I think those are very important issues that require clarification. In terms of procedure, instead of going through the lengthy process of calling out each charge and calling out every county delegation, we will make it simple, but it will realize the same objectives. When the county is called, bear in mind that there are three charges – and everybody has an Order Paper – there is (a), which is procurement, just to summarize because you can read for yourself; there is (b), which is public finance management; and there is (c), which is the violation of the Constitution. I would imagine a county delegation voting like: “Yes to all the three;” or “No to all the three;” or you can decide, in the words of Sen. Wako, maybe one or two. So, in that instance, the county delegation would state that “Yes for A; No for B and Yes for C; or “No for C.” We can use A, B, C to make it simpler since we already have the Order Paper. Is that very clear?"
}