Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 41719,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/41719/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 99,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Very well! Member for Chepalungu, you stood on a point of order. A point of order, as you all are aware, raises matters which are not in compliance with the Standing Orders, where there is a breach or where you have cause to complain. As I see it, and from my evaluation of what has transpired, nothing is out of order! The Minister was asked Question No.929, and it is in three parts. He was asked to state the circumstances that led to the death of Ms. Fatuma Farah in Garissa. The Assistant Minister has answered that he is not aware that Ms. Fatuma Farah died in Garissa on 25th March, 1994. That is a good answer. So, if you want to ask further questions, then force the Assistant Minister, by interrogation and by questions, to give you more information. Otherwise, what you have done, Member for Chepalungu, is merely stage an argument against the Assistant Minister. That, obviously, under Standing Order No.43, is not allowed. Standing Order No.43(3) reads:- “A Question shall not contain any argument, inference, opinion, imputation or ironical or offensive expression of epithet.” So, what you are doing is merely staging an argument. The Assistant Minister has said that Ms. Farah did not die in Garissa on that day. Ambassador Affey says she died in Garissa on that day. That is an argument. Is that all right?"
}