Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 431283,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/431283/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 124,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "be summoned and that I was to be invited. That did not happen. This is already a flaw. That is why the response we have got here, which I will shortly look at, is really a public relations exercise. That is the furthest it can go. I will acknowledge one or two areas where there has been some achievement. It is always good to appreciate the effort. Coming to the points, there is a case where the Government response is that there is no need to declare the situation a national disaster. Is there a disaster? You need to acknowledge that there is or there is not. There is a disaster because it is still an on-going problem. If there is, why not make the declaration? This is a matter we laid before the President when we were invited. It was agreed that this matter be declared a national disaster for two reasons. First, in order to enlist the support of Parliament and everybody or all Kenyans in trying to find a solution to this conflict and secondly, in order to attract other donors or well-wishers both nationally and internationally, that is why we sought for this declaration. Unless somebody says that there is no need, the circumstances are such that it is necessary that, that declaration must be made. The reasons given here of austerity measures and running parallel do not hold. The circumstances are very serious. The Commission that we sought---"
}