Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 431583,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/431583/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 424,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Ochieng",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2955,
        "legal_name": "David Ouma Ochieng'",
        "slug": "david-ouma-ochieng"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, with regard to the current numbering, that is, 10, before we can summarily deal with Clause 3(b)(10) as has been proposed by the Chairman that every procuring entity shall ensure that all money is paid out into accounts, I think this assumes a lot. It assumes that we have passed a very important stage. I do not want to pre-empt debate, but what is proposed at Clause 2 has a lot to do with what is now in Clause 3(b)(10). This is because if we defined “youth” the way the Constitution defines it then we will not need Clause 3(b)(10). It presupposes that someone can pay money into an account that does not belong to a company owned by the youth, persons with disabilities, or women. My point is this: If you look at what is being proposed now you will realize that we are opening up the ownership of companies by young people. That is the---"
}