Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 437748,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/437748/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 17,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "but also says that we may, as a House, decide to go the Committee way. So, when we have the Motion before us – I thought I explained it in my communication – that the Motion is debating the special committee of 11 Members. If we defeat that Motion, then it means that the House has decided not to go the option of the Committee but the plenary. So, I think that is very clear. What I think you may be concerned a bit is part (b) in terms of hearing of the charges. Now my argument would be that the charges can be heard at the plenary, but those charges are also part of the documents that have already been submitted to you for your consideration for the reasons that Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale has suggested. So you are already seized of the matter. Secondly, you remember whenever an issue comes to the Floor, we are always being petitioned or a Statement is being sought from a Chair of a Committee. We are basically referred to as a House. When it is referred to the Committee, the Committee is acting on behalf of the House. By the time it comes to the plenary, that is when all of us become again seized of the same matter. So, I do not see any violation of the Standing No.68 (1) because of the way we have proposed to proceed. Senate Majority Leader!"
}