GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/44002/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 44002,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/44002/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 1203,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Prof. Anyang’-Nyong’o",
    "speaker_title": "The Minister for Medical Services",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 193,
        "legal_name": "Peter Anyang' Nyong'o",
        "slug": "peter-nyongo"
    },
    "content": " Mr. Chairman, Sir, I appreciate the concerns of hon. Chachu and the concerns of my friend, hon. Bahari, but the word “shall” comes from the first paragraph, which states that:- “The Commission shall resolve all issues arising from the first review…” Precisely because hon. Bahari and hon. Chachu realize that there were still issues pending from the earlier review, the Commission is being given the responsibility to complete this process, but that does not mean, however, that the Commission is only confined to that review. That is why the first paragraph is very important. It says that the Commission shall resolve all issues arising from the first review relating to the delimitation of boundaries of constituencies and publish its final report. In other words, the issues also include the concerns by hon. Chachu and hon. Bahari. So, do not think that those concerns are excluded from the word “shall”. Those concerns are the wider framework which the IIBRC Report is being used as a source material. I really think that by using the word “may”, you are not improving your argument. The word “may” is just weaker than the word “shall”. The word “shall” is strong in the first paragraph which includes the Members’ views as well as those of the defunct IIBRC. Then this particular body is being given the responsibility to make sure that all the issues are addressed."
}