Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 440684,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/440684/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 86,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Iringo",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1574,
        "legal_name": "Cyprian Kubai Iringo",
        "slug": "cyprian-kubai-iringo"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, thank you for giving me this opportunity to seek a clarification. The way the Chairperson has issued his Statement is that the central Government just handed over whatever was done to the county governments and it is up to the county governments to pick them from there. It was just a sweeping statement to the extent that there was work which was done at a particular percentage and level and from that point, the county governments were supposed to take over. I believe that if the work was started by the central Government, it should have completed by the same central Government. But when you say the work was transferred to the county government, what was the level of completion? If you go to the ground, there are cases even in my own constituency where there are incomplete ESP projects. But if you want to know who will continue with them, nobody will tell you whether it is the county government or the Ministry of Health, which had started them. There are projects in my constituency - like Kangeta Health Center - which are halfway done, and we are wondering who is going to complete them. A lot of money was pumped into it that health centre and it is going to waste. It is not benefiting anybody and so, there should be clarity. Who is going to complete those projects so that the taxpayers’ money does not go down the drain? The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}