Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 446733,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/446733/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 94,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Hon. Members, you will recall that on Wednesday, 26th March, 2014, I gave a Communication regarding the procedure for scrutinizing statutory instruments by this House. Whereas the Communication then focused on providing guidance on the procedure for considering statutory instruments, I also underscored the necessity for the House to, in so far as is practically possible, have the statutory instruments considered in good time. In fulfillment of the requirements of Section 11 of the Statutory Instruments Act, 2013, 14 statutory instruments have since been tabled before the House. As required by Section 12(1) of the said Act, these instruments effectively stood referred to the Committee on Delegated Legislation for consideration. Upon committal, the Committee on Delegated Legislation is supposed to:- (a) scrutinize the statutory instruments for compliance with the matters specified under Section 13 of the said Act, together with such other requirements as may exist in the Interpretation and General Provisions Act relating to subsidiary legislation; (b) concur with the regulation making authority in the manner contemplated under Section 16 of the Statutory Instruments Act, 2013; and, (c) table a report in the House containing only a resolution that the statutory instrument, or part thereof, is to be revoked, as contemplated under Section 15 of the Statutory Instruments Act, 2013."
}