Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 449511,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/449511/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 156,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Well, the Chairperson of the Committee has an answer where it says: “I wish to confirm that there has been no eviction of any homesteads in the Mauche Division.” That is the answer she has. The rest you can only leave it to your maker. Wait until you get the Cabinet Secretary. Unless you want the Cabinet Secretary summoned to the Committee, you will not get a different response. This is the response she has given. The Chairperson is not going to give a different answer unless you say that you think the response is not satisfactory and should be referred back for purposes of getting the Cabinet Secretary to come and respond to what you are saying. Even if you argue with the Chairperson she will not tell you that what she has read is not correct; that is what she has been given. I only still hope that we can all see the hopelessness of this situation. If the Cabinet Secretary was here to respond to what you are saying, it would be a completely different ball game. The House would be able to express itself on the response she is giving, but now this is translated through the Chairperson. This is why we are insisting that we need to change this system. And, of course you have approved the changes. Hon. Kiuna, we are implementing this by 1st July, 2014. So, you could request that this matter be taken back to the Committee for this purpose because you appear to have been comfortable with the other responses only that you are unhappy with the assertion that nobody has been evicted. So, would you want the matter taken back so that you can have the Cabinet Secretary and yourself appear?"
}