Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 452386,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/452386/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 388,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Prof.) Nyikal",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 434,
        "legal_name": "James Nyikal",
        "slug": "james-nyikal"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I would want first of all to speak about this. If we say that every clause which we go through will carry this--- I am not a lawyer, but I would like the lawyers here to guide us on this. If there is a provision that carries all that is needed, is there need for every clause you bring in to have particulars? Let me speak, because I have been allowed. I have seen when we are making law, we refer to the Constitution, and we mention a particular Article; we do not import anything. What is going to happen here is that we are going to talk about virtually everything in every clause in relation to Islamic Law. In reality, when we are talking as technical people, why can we not say that Clause 48, which carries everything, is adequate?"
}