Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 452779,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/452779/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 781,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kaluma",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1565,
        "legal_name": "George Peter Opondo Kaluma",
        "slug": "george-peter-opondo-kaluma"
    },
    "content": "Yes! I want to explain the following:- Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman and my honourable colleagues, when you look at Clause 44, it does not say that the first wife shall be informed. What these provisions are saying are the details which should be in the notification and I think you should support their deletion. I want to beg for your audience on this. These are the particular details which the husband has to put in the notification. What will happen is that he will file the notification there. The provisions do not say your husband will have to inform you or be with you when filling this notification. So, when the man dies, what you will have is a situation where you were not informed of the marriage because the provisions really, do not require that. It is a requirement in the notification. Another woman you did not know as a co-wife will spring a notification telling you that really, even your husband confirmed you are already informed and she will take your property before you know it. So, really, before you oppose the deletion, look at it very keenly. By the way, you will have a lot of difficulties. Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I want to end by saying---"
}