GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/453709/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 453709,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/453709/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 201,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Elmi",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 82,
        "legal_name": "Mohamed Ibrahim Elmi",
        "slug": "mohamed-elmi"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Speaker, I should not be discriminated because of my hair style. I have a special barber. Mine is on three clarifications. I want to ask through the hon. Chairman why the police took that action. In their view, was it radicalizing or not? Do you not think that probably that action radicalizes more youth across the country on live television? Secondly, whatprogrammes are there? If the hon. Member and other people knew that there was a problem at the mosque, what action did they take? They have no programmes to stop youths from being radicalized. What measures will the Government take to top radicalization or are we as a country allowing this thing to go on? Finally, when giving a statement people must be credible. Al Shabaab is a clandestine movement in our country. If you are talking of people who were making announcements and you were not arresting them--- Any Kenyan knows when the prayer is called, people enter mosques. Any Muslim passing by will enter a mosque next to him,if it is prayer time. I saw the police storming that mosque and it made me feel so bad. I saw somebody shooting at themosque. That thing was terrible! So, the question is who gave that order? Why did they not arrest all those people, if they were so bad? The bad people will not invite people for prayers, food and recruitment into Al Shabaab . They hide. When people give Statements to Parliament, they must give credible. Hon. Chairman, did you question this Statement before you brought it to the Floor of the House?"
}