Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 458615,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/458615/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 891,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Ms.) Nyasuna",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 590,
        "legal_name": "Gladys Atieno Nyasuna",
        "slug": "gladys-atieno-nyasuna"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, in view of the Speaker’s ruling, protecting sub-Regulation (d), I am looking at the deletion of sub- Regulation (3). Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, if we delete Clause 18(3) as proposed in the amendments – Page 443 of the Order Paper – then you leave it hanging. If you say that (d) is protected and then you say that 20 per cent is for religious institutions as a grant and (3) comes in to say how exactly they shall administer within their jurisdictions and so on--- If you continue with the amendments, that is, (d) deleting paragraph (3) that would be tricky. So, I think that if (d) is dropped then the amendment of deletion of (3) should also be dropped. I know you have closed any thoughts on your earlier ruling, but here I hope that you will consider it well so that we can listen to what hon. Oyugi is saying and then judge as a House and then vote on it. Religious institutions have played a major role in working with the youth and women in this country. For a long time they have done it pro bono; from their own resources for a very long time. I hope that through this they can be motivated even to do a lot more of the work that they have already been doing for as long as the selection is objective and the standards of who is registered and who is not is clear. I am not opposed to having religious institutions benefit."
}