Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 460866,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/460866/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 258,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Under paragraph 17, lawyers who are representing parties be it in the arbitral processes, be it in the court processes have to be subjected to disciplinary processes. I mean our system of justice is adversarial. As a lawyer, I act on instructions of a client and this is what these lawyers were doing. You cannot take it from them to act and they act on instructions. By the way, we do not have to recommend that as a House. We should not make such recommendations. We can go to the disciplinary committee. We can go to the complaints commission. If, indeed, there is something tangible beyond the mere fact that a lawyer represented a party in a deal that we will later confirm as a House has a problem, we should not make such recommendations. I beg that we agree to this amendment so that we can deal with this matter and end the corruption within arbitral processes. To me, this report is very good so that we may not have situations and recommendations which make us fail to have the effect we are seeking."
}