GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/487468/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 487468,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/487468/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 238,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Ms.) Odhiambo-Mabona",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 376,
        "legal_name": "Millie Grace Akoth Odhiambo Mabona",
        "slug": "millie-odhiambo-mabona"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Chairlady, I think what the hon. Chair is worried about, just for your information, is cured by the provision subject to the provision of the evidence Act unless you dropped (b). If it is subject to the evidence Act, then it means even when you have a magistrate dealing with the matter, they will not hear the evidence of the victim at the tail end. It has to follow the process of evidence giving. The evidence giving is not at the tail end. If we close out the victim unless they have an advocate, then it would also be prejudicial to victims who cannot hire advocates. So, I want to encourage the Chair that we make it subject to the provisions of the Evidence Act. The Evidence Act has a very clear process that a trial goes through, unless I do not know, if you can clarify--- I do not know which ones you have dropped. I do not know whether you dropped (b). But if (b) is there, then it cures it because it is subject to the Evidence Act."
}