Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 494308,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/494308/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 137,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "A maximum of one hundred and twenty (120) minutes for the Mover in moving and sixty (60) minutes in replying, and a maximum of ninety (90) minutes for the Mover in moving and sixty (60) minutes in replying, and a maximum of ninety (90) minutes for any other member speaking, except the Leader of the Majority Party and the Leader of the Minority Party, who shall each be limited to a maximum of one (1) hour and five (5) minutes each, and that priority be accorded to the Leader of Majority Party and the Minority Party in that order. Hon. Speaker, I think it is important to give a perspective to this. As you have rightly pointed out, the uniqueness of these two Bills – and this Bill in particular - arises from the fact that not only is it extremely voluminous, but their contents also include texts of existing enactments that they propose to amend. For example, the Bill before us - the Insolvency Bill - has a total of 703 pages and it is made up of the following:- (i) Contents and arrangements of Clauses – 37 pages. (ii) Main text of the Bill – 556 pages. (iii) Schedules – 45 pages. (iv) Memorandum of Objects and Reasons – 46 pages (v) Texts of enactments proposed to be amended - 19 pages, giving a total of 703 pages."
}