GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/496087/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 496087,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/496087/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 1069,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Ms.) Abdalla",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 382,
        "legal_name": "Amina Ali Abdalla",
        "slug": "amina-abdalla"
    },
    "content": "Commission shall in such manner as may be prescribed, ensure that the inhabitants or communities who prefer to be compensated by way of resettlement as a result of being displaced by a proposed mineral operation are settled on suitable alternate land, with due regard to their economic wellbeing, social and cultural values and the resettlement is carried out in accordance with the relevant physical planning law. (9) The cost of resettlement under sub-clause (8) shall be borne by the holder of the Mineral Right. This is an important amendment in that no mining operation shall begin before the lawful occupier or owner of the land is compensated. This is to avoid people starting mining and then change their goal posts about compensation. On the second one, we are putting the situation of the new subclause 8, so that we can give an alternative to persons who are displaced by a mining operation to be resettled in a suitable area. The new sub-clause 8 is to ensure that we know who is going to do the compensation and we have put it as the responsibility of the mining right holder."
}