GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/500338/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 500338,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/500338/?format=api",
"text_counter": 232,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Hon. A. B. Duale",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 15,
"legal_name": "Aden Bare Duale",
"slug": "aden-duale"
},
"content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, number one, if you look at the first Section 62(1) and 62 (1A), it is more or less the same. In fact, it is like duplication. We are talking of the same executive authority. More importantly, when we use the same reason as before, it is discriminatory. Why single out State or public officers with executive authority? However, more fundamentally, the Chair did it very well and we discussed this thing even in the last Parliament. Parliament does not have the tools to do even forensic audit. Parliament recommends to other institutions like the Auditor General, Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission and CID. It cannot give a verdict that your salary will be stopped as a public or State officer for the period you are under investigation. So, I think it is more of duplication. So, with that, I agree with the President in as far as deleting this subsection is concerned."
}