Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 502616,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/502616/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 203,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Aden",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 15,
        "legal_name": "Aden Bare Duale",
        "slug": "aden-duale"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. I support the amendment. “Summarily” in the world of today shuts off all fair hearing, and you know we have an opportunity for a person to be fairly heard. When it comes to sub-clause (5) on badges and licenses, I just wanted the Chairman of the Departmental Committee on Health to clarify. The practising licence can be hung on the wall; the practitioner attending to that particular patient might do something that, that particular patient might want to complain about. Whom does he say attended to him? Can we get some clarification? Maybe we are running away from badges but whilst it might act--- I agree that inclusion of practising licences is okay; the word “license” was also there earlier. I do not see why we are running away from the word “badges”. I think the professional attending to a particular person must be recognized, so that if a complaint is raised, that particular patient might be able to say they were attended to by one Abdikadir Aden. Thank you."
}