GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/505620/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 505620,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/505620/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 235,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Dr.) Pukose",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1458,
        "legal_name": "Robert Pukose",
        "slug": "robert-pukose"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. Just looking at the same Constitution, Article 49(c) talks of being able to communicate with an advocate and other persons whose assistance is necessary. If we are going to keep this child who requires assistance from the guardian or the parent for seven days before you can communicate, then I think it will be unconstitutional. I think the middle ground will be we go to the Constitution and accept the 24 hours instead of us deleting ‘arrest’ or ‘detained’. Let us go to 24 hours so that we limit the period. In any case, the child should be able to say where his parents or guardians are and 24 hours is adequate for people to communicate to the relatives."
}