Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 506913,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/506913/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 266,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "know where the comp went to. I think it is not fair. If we really mean to enact laws, we really need to be a bit more decent. You cannot provide in the long title for those offices and you clearly specify them, but then remove them from the Memorandum of Objects and Reasons. You talk about Designated State Offices, Vice- President, Prime Minister, Deputy President and then you omit Deputy Prime Minister. If, indeed, it is true that the Budget and Appropriations Committee looked at this Bill, did it look at the offices specified in the long title or did it look at the offices with regard to money? Did it look at the offices as specified in the first paragraph of the Memorandum of Objects and Reasons to the exclusion of other offices stated in the long title? It is fair that even as we discuss it, we know when the Budget and Appropriations Committee, to which hon. John Mbadi is an active member, a ranking Member as he claims--- Did it look at these offices inclusive of the type of offices as stated in the long title, or inclusive only of those in the first paragraph in the Memorandum of Objects and Reasons thus, perhaps, necessitating hon. Aden Duale to make a correction to incorporate what is in your long title? I am not in any way trying to justify what hon. Duale has done. But is it conceivable that hon. Aden Duale then has decided to pick from what is in the long title of your Bill, so that he brings it to be in consonance with what is in the Bill?"
}