Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 512799,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/512799/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 412,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Chepkong’a",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1154,
        "legal_name": "Samuel Kiprono Chepkonga",
        "slug": "samuel-kiprono-chepkonga"
    },
    "content": "THAT, the Bill be amended by deleting clause 39; The reason for this is that it makes reference to Clauses 37 and 38 on the procedure of appeal from the High Court to the Court of Appeal. It does not also show that there is the Supreme Court. It means you are restricting the rights of the person who wants to go all the way to the Supreme Court, if they want a determination on a matter of law, not necessarily a matter of fact. Matters of fact are determined by the High Court and by the Court of Appeal. But, if somebody is aggrieved and feels the matter requires to be determined by the Supreme Court, it is not contained here, yet it is contained in other rules. This is too restrictive. Thank you."
}