Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 512835,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/512835/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 448,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Sakaja",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13131,
        "legal_name": "Johnson Arthur Sakaja",
        "slug": "johnson-arthur-sakaja"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I am still convinced to support the amendment. I beseech my colleagues sitting together to give us a more compelling argument as to why another order that is issued on a civil matter, for example under the Matrimonial Causes Act or even another that has nothing to do with this potential law, should be subservient to an order issued under this law. What makes this law superior to orders made under any other law, especially when it is not a related issue or even if it is related? An example in this Bill is dealing with a child but having to recognise a civil order dealing with matrimonial issues. Why should this one weigh more? Give us a compelling argument. If you do, we will support you."
}