GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/513187/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 513187,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/513187/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 188,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "You find averments here, that the circular on the ceilingson recurrent expenditures issued, were granted in that advisory capacity. However, the circulars cannot be quashed subsequent to (a) above. I am just looking at some of the areas. However, the Report states that ceilings in the circular are not binding on county assemblies since they are not directed and can only be binding if adopted by this Senate, or Parliament for that matter. If we make such averments in this Report which I got just about an hour ago, we need to build synergies with institutions like TA and the office of the Controller of Budget, which are legitimate. However, these are technical and advisory institutions. You find averments in this Report that the Committee noted the Controller of Budget has a duty to oversee the implementation of the respective budgets of various county governments by authorizing withdrawals. The Controller of Budget enforced the ceilings set by CRA to promote prudence of pre-financial management and with concurrence of the Committee. How can the Committee concur without bringing any issue here for approval of this Senate? How can they act as a prefecture and give authority to such miscarriage of the law in the Constitution?"
}