GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/519325/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 519325,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/519325/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 164,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Mule",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2321,
        "legal_name": "Stephen Mutinda Mule",
        "slug": "stephen-mutinda-mule"
    },
    "content": "The UN Charter is very clear that the best interest of the child remains with the mother until the child is over 18 years. That makes us think why we have to deal with issues which the courts are mandated to deal with. For instance, where there is abuse of the child by the mother, then the father can go to court. Where there is abuse of the child by the father, the mother can go to court and secure the best interest of the child. The Member is trying to get the best interest of the child from where it has been placed internationally, and put it into the Act to make sure that the child is protected. I am coming from a human rights perspective whereby the child is voiceless and has no defender. The defender of the child is the Constitution and the United Nations Charter. Despite anything else, let us do justice to the voiceless; and the voiceless in this case is the child. So, I propose that we delete Clauses 2, 3, 4---"
}