Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 535340,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/535340/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 264,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Nyamweya",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 391,
        "legal_name": "Manson Oyongo Nyamweya",
        "slug": "manson-nyamweya"
    },
    "content": "On Page 2, the date stated when this exercise will be completed is 31st March, 2014. This is about last year and not this year! The same Report states that some investigation will be completed by 28th February, 2015. Now, when you go through this Report and you realize such errors--- Lawyers are here and they will tell you that a date is so important and if you cited a wrong one, you could easily lose a case. When we say that this Report is trash, we are not saying the President made a mistake. What we are saying here is that the investigators have not done their job well. Unfortunately, out of trust, the President has given this Report to the National Assembly and we are debating it. We are condemning people who are innocent. I wish to refer Members to Page 21 of this Report which is about the Ministry of Water, Environment and Natural Resources. I want to provide a letter written by the EACC. I do not know if I should table it, hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. This letter refers to two officers who have been mentioned that they are being investigated. We have a letter from the same body which exonerates the officers from any further investigation. At the moment, as we sit here, these two officers from the Ministry of Water, Environment and Natural Resources, Mrs. Mary Musoma and Mr. Jeremiah Matoke have been named in the Report. However, when you read this letter that the EACC wrote--- I do not know if I should table it for the record of the House and compare it with what the President was given. I am raising the issue of credibility of the Report that we are discussing here."
}