GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/539713/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 539713,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/539713/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 131,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "For example, an administrative action is commissioned by a junior officer or a junior level of Government or a lower level of Government but you want action to be taken vertically by the next level of Government. What kind of a provision and position do we have for a lower officer or a lower level of Government to complain to the next level when the next level does actions that are not necessarily the right actions? So, this is for purposes of internal mechanisms. I have mentioned the issue of time. We have provisions in the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) legislation that requires that when certain actions by certain individuals affect the environment in one manner or the other to an extent that the environment also affects the communities, there is the element of the polluter paying. To what extent can this legislation look at those kinds of directions? How do we get to have a community get paid through NEMA and that goes to the whole issue of information. How do we get this information out to the public? To what extent should the public be engaged to get to know exactly that when this happens or when it does not happen, this is the direction where I have to go. This is the next level that I have to reach and this is exactly what I expect. So in my view, there are certain things that the Bill still has to look at for purpose of particularly what I am calling communal individual. Thank you."
}