Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 546354,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/546354/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 828,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Member for Kigumo, in principle, what you are dealing with here is very laudable, and a correct issue of principle. People who go to IPOA, all manner of things do not delay contracts. People also get to know their decisions as early as possible. But you need to be careful about these timelines. They appear too strict that they may be unachievable. For example, the 30 days may or may not work. I suspect they may work. To tell the Court of Appeal that they will have disposed of that matter within 14 days will be very strict. What we will turn back to is that you will make IPOA some kind of a big creature. When they make decision they know, invariably it is not easy to overturn what they are saying. The answer lies in relaxing and putting a realistic timeline knowing the burdens they have at the courts. If you talk about 60 days, you are talking about something that is achievable. Let me hear other Members. Member for Bondo."
}