Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 546416,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/546416/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 890,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Eng.) Gumbo",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 24,
        "legal_name": "Nicholas Gumbo",
        "slug": "nicholas-gumbo"
    },
    "content": "(3) A nominated subcontractor may only be engaged on a necessity basis whereby the works to be undertaken by the nominated subcontractor require greater skills and specialization than the contractor’s or main contractor’s or where the general complexity of the skills and specialization required are such that the form and function may be lost if the works were undertaken by the contractor or main contractor. (4) The procuring entity shall prepare separate and distinct tender documents for engagement of a nominated sub-contractor. The reason I wanted to explain this is because when I completed doing this New Clause 150A, it was in the very early hours of the morning. It was around 4.00 a.m. and my brain capacity was down to less than ten per cent. However, I have just read Clause 150(1) and (2) as provided and I am confident of it because it says: “If the tender documents do not prohibit subcontracting, the successful tenderer my subcontract part of the tender but only if the person to be subcontracted has not been debarred from procurement proceedings in accordance with this Act or has participated in the procurement of goods, works or services related to that contract. The successful tenderer shall be responsible towards the procuring entity for the obligations of the sub-contractor”"
}