Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 551314,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/551314/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 214,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Mositet",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 608,
        "legal_name": "Peter Korinko Mositet",
        "slug": "peter-korinko-mositet"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, Mr. Temporary Chairperson, Sir. Of course, we have agreed and we have passed the law that at least the Auditor-General needs to be given the space to vet the security department. It will really defeat the purpose again if we say that after allowing him to do the audit the same person or institution that will be audited is going to vet the person who is going to do the audit. With all due respect, I know definitely the people who are going to be assigned to the office of the Auditor-General will be credible. They will not even be a security risk because if they are, even the Auditor-General’s office will be a security risk. The issue of imagining that the Auditor-General’s office can be a security threat to that department is not there. So, at the introduction of that, you are giving it out there and then blocking it. We must make sure that we delete it and allow the Auditor-General to make sure that the officers he or she sends will go without intimidation. This is because vetting itself will start intimidating those people. So, automatically it will be compromising the principles of the people who are going to audit. With all due respect, that particular Clause needs to be deleted. I support the deletion."
}