Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 551315,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/551315/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 215,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. M. Kajwang",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13162,
        "legal_name": "Moses Otieno Kajwang'",
        "slug": "moses-otieno-kajwang"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Temporary Chairperson, Sir, I also support the proposal to delete Clause 39(3). I also sympathise with some of the concerns raised by Sen. Haji but probably those concerns could be misplaced. I still believe that if an auditor has be sent by the Auditor-General to go and audit those security related sectors, there would still be certain procedures that they have to go through; procedures for access to premises and so on. There would still be procedures that would not need to come here. When you put 39(3) in this Act, it means that the person being audited will be allowed to decide who is coming to audit them. Of course, there is the fear that the Auditor-General might have hired some people who became radicalized along the way and joined funny groupings. When you send them to some of these installations, they can go ahead and pursue their beliefs. I believe there can still be procedures that can be put in place without them coming here. If you put this, then the Auditor-"
}