Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 551491,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/551491/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 391,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": ". (1) Any person who is aggrieved by an administrative action or of proceedings decision may apply for review of the administrative action or decision to- (a) a court in accordance with section 8; or (b) a tribunal in exercise of its jurisdiction conferred in that regard under any written law. (2) A court or tribunal under subsection (1) may review an administrative action or decision, if- (a) the person who made the decision- (i) was not authorized to do so by the empowering provision; (ii) acted in excess of jurisdiction or power conferred under any written law; (iii) acted pursuant to delegated power in contravention of any law prohibiting such delegation; (iv) was biased or may reasonably be suspected of bias; or (v) denied the person to whom the administrative action or decision relates, a reasonable opportunity to state the person’s case; (b) a mandatory and material procedure or condition prescribed by an empowering provision was not complied with; (c) the action or decision was procedurally unfair; (d) the action or decision was materially influenced by an error of law; (e) the administrative action or decision in issue was taken with an ulterior motive or purpose calculated to prejudice the legal rights of the applicant; (f) the administrator failed to take into account relevant considerations; (g) the administrator acted on the direction of a person or body not authorised or empowered by any written law to give such directions; (h) the administrative action or decision was made in bad faith; (i) the administrative action or decision is not rationally connected to- (i) the purpose for which it was taken; (ii) the purpose of the empowering provision; (iii) the information before the administrator; or (iv) the reasons given for it by the administrator; (j) there was an abuse of discretion, unreasonable delay or failure to act in discharge of a duty imposed under any written law; (k) the administrative action or decision is unreasonable; (l) the administrative action or decision is not proportionate to the interests or rights affected;"
}