Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 552558,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/552558/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 473,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Langat",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 384,
        "legal_name": "Benjamin Kipkirui Langat",
        "slug": "benjamin-langat"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, if you look at Clause 32(2), it makes the amendments by Senate to be irrelevant and superfluous. If I read to you, it says: “The final report by an internal auditor which has been deliberated on and adopted by audit committee of a state organ or public entity may be copied to the auditor general.” So, that is where the Senate wanted to say “shall be copied to the Auditor General.” If you look at Clause 32(2) it says that the Auditor-General shall have unhindered access to all the internal audit reports of a state organ or any public entity under sub-section (1) above which is subject to audit by the Auditor-General as provided under Article 229(4) of the Constitution. So, the amendment that they are trying to bring is actually unnecessary."
}