Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 554582,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/554582/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 194,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "my body. On this debate, as I support the mediated version of the Division of Revenue Bill, I go back to 2013 when we just came in and I sought your ruling on the same. You made an elaborate ruling on this matter, a ruling that many people faulted, especially those who felt they should be enemies of the National Assembly. Without any basis, we were bashed for undermining the Senate. However, we had genuine concerns. My colleagues have read Article 95 of the Constitution and I want to repeat it for record. Article 95(4) talks about the role of the National Assembly and Article 96(3) talks about the role of the Senate. I was asking myself why the framers of the Constitution were very particular on these two Articles of the Constitution. Article 95(4) talks about the National Assembly determining the allocation of national revenue between the two levels of government. The determination of national revenue between those two levels of government is through the Division of Revenue Bill, under which we divide the national revenue between the national Government and the county governments. Then Article 96(3) is very specific that:"
}