GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/56128/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 56128,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/56128/?format=api",
"text_counter": 96,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Dr. Oburu",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 194,
"legal_name": "Oburu Ngona Odinga",
"slug": "oburu-odinga"
},
"content": "Mr. Speaker, Sir, I am absolutely unaware of any case where the Attorney-General went to court to have orders lifted or failed to have these people punished. I have two cases here. One was the Banking Fraud Investigations Unit application versus George Odinga Donde. In this case, there was an order given by Mrs. T. N. Ngugi. This was not from the Attorney-General but it was an order given by the court. It reads:- âThe notice of motion application dated 21st December, 2006 brought under Section 118 and 121 (1) of the CPC and Section 180 of the Evidence Act coming up for hearing before hon. T.N. Ngugi, Mrs. S.R.M. on 30th January, 2007, in the presence of S.P. Koywer for the applicant and Mr. Onyango and Mr. Odongo for the respondent. Upon hearing both S.P. Koywer and Mr. Onyango, it is hereby ordered:- 1. That the application is hereby dismissed with no orders as to costs. 2. That the respondent is hereby allowed to continue operating his account No.0150118918000 in the name of George Odinga Donde, personal Standard Chartered Bank Account on this order of 21st February, 2007.â Mr. Speaker, Sir, I have another similar one for a different client. These two are the ones I know were taken and both of them were dismissed but not with the intervention of the Attorney-General. These cases were heard fully and determined by competent magistrates and decisions made. If there is any other information where the Attorney-General went to appeal, I am not aware of it."
}