GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/564770/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 564770,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/564770/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 789,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Oyugi",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 444,
        "legal_name": "Augostinho Neto Oyugi",
        "slug": "augostinho-neto-oyugi"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. I thought you said that if we have a contrary opinion to what the Chairperson is saying then we should press the intervention button. I was just trying to be a good student. I would like to request the Chairlady to consider the amendment she is proposing in Clause 83 (a). The amendment says many things. The Committee is proposing that you can only have a licence issued by the Regulatory Board upon submission of an application and such supporting documents to the Board. However, Clause 84 stipulates how that particular licence is granted so that it definitely takes away the conditions. If you want to subject the giving of a licence to conditions that are not stipulated, it will be subject to abuse. You need to stipulate the conditions for which you can get a licence. It is very well done under Clause 84 such that you stopped at saying “the Board” as opposed to saying “upon submission of an application and such supporting documents.” Clause 88 also states the conditions of obtaining the licence. To give a discretionary role to the Board without necessary stipulating what those conditions are would make the Board act in ultra vires manner."
}